Vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopaenia with widespread abdominal venous thrombosis, venous ischaemia and bowel oedema
- 1 Emergency Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
- 2 Medicine, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
- Correspondence to Dr Fabiha Parveen; fabiha.parveen@nhs.net
Abstract
A 49-year-old woman presented with severe abdominal pain and per rectal bleed, 13 days after receiving the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Blood tests showed remarkably low platelet count, unmeasurable D-dimer levels and low fibrinogen levels, consistent with a diagnosis of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopaenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation. CT mesenteric angiogram revealed massive portosplenic mesenteric vein thrombosis. CT head also noted non-occlusive thrombosis at several sites. She was treated with intravenous immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, anticoagulants and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. Following a prolonged inpatient stay, she was discharged with subsequent short bowel syndrome and long-term parenteral nutrition. This particular clinical scenario aims to highlight the importance for clinicians to remain vigilant for rare complications associated with the AstraZeneca vaccine and the subsequent management involved, at a time where it is vital to vaccinate globally in order to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background
The introduction of vaccines has been the most important countermeasure against the COVID-19 pandemic. Over a short period of time (December 2020 to March 2021), the European Medicines Agency has approved four vaccines, which include Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. In February 2021, a new disease had been documented in association with the AstraZeneca vaccine, known as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopaenia (VITT).1
VITT involves a constellation of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia observed in patients after vaccination with the AstraZeneca vaccine. It is a rare documented complication of the vaccine; in the UK, more than 20 million people have been vaccinated with AstraZeneca, of which 79 cases of rare blood clots with low platelets as well as 19 deaths have been reported. This equates to approximately one case per 250 000 people vaccinated and one death per million.2
We present below a case of AstraZeneca-induced VITT, which presented at a district general hospital and required the involvement of a multidisciplinary team to provide appropriate management. As it is a rare and novel disease, our aim of this case report is to raise awareness of its presentation, investigation and management.
Case presentation
A 49-year-old woman presented to the accident and emergency department of a district general hospital with a 2-day history of central abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhoea.
On admission, she had passed approximately 600 mL of blood per rectally. She became unstable and immediately was resuscitated with intravenous fluids. On examination, there was tenderness throughout the abdomen, more markedly in the umbilical and left iliac fossa. On auscultation, her bowel sounds were sluggish.
Her previous medical history included mild asthma and uterine fibroids. She had no regular medications or drug allergies. She had received the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine 13 days previously.
Investigations
Investigation results were available in the following order: the venous blood gas showed lactate of 3.4 mmol/L, base excess –8 mmol/L and haemoglobin 109 g/L.
A CT mesenteric angiogram (figure 1) showed massive venous thrombosis of the visceral vessels (portal vein, splenic vein and superior mesenteric vein), resulting in venous ischaemia. There was also suggestion of ischaemic colitis, evidenced by marked stranding of the adjacent viscera, and a possible abdominal haematoma with a feeding vessel superior to the bladder (figure 2).
CT mesenteric angiogram showing massive portal vein thrombosis (orange arrow).
CT mesenteric angiogram: abdominal mass superior to the bladder which is of high attenuation pre-contrast suggesting a haematoma with a feeding vessel (orange arrow).
Blood investigations revealed a severe thrombocytopaenia with a platelet count of 6×109/L; fibrinogen levels of 0.6 g/L and d-dimer that could not be analysed despite four attempts, therefore advised by the laboratory to treat as maximum (>128 000 ng/mL). Furthermore, her coagulation profile was raised: international normalised ratio of 1.9, prothrombin time of 24.0 s and an activated partial thromboplastin time of 36.0 s. Her renal functions showed a severe acute kidney injury. Liver function tests, however, were within normal parameters.
Her COVID-19 PCR testing via nasopharyngeal swab returned negative.
Based on her deranged blood parameters, urgent discussion with the haematology consultant ensued; a presumed diagnosis of VITT and resultant disseminated intravascular coagulation were made.
Treatment
Her immediate management as advised by the local haematology consultant consisted of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) at a dose of 1 g/kg, methylprednisolone at 500 mg intravenously and transfusion with two units of red cells and two units of cryoprecipitate. Due to the ongoing internal bleeding, the decision to not anticoagulate was made. Once stabilised, she was further discussed and immediately reviewed by the surgical, medical and intensive care team.
Outcome and follow-up
The decision was made to transfer the patient to a tertiary centre within 7 hours of initial presentation, where she went on to have a prolonged inpatient stay (approximately 3 months). A platelet factor 4 (PF-4) antibody assay (ELISA) was later performed, concluding VITT as the diagnosis.
On day 1, she underwent a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure and thrombolysis for the portomesenteric thrombosis. This was repeated again on day 3; CT showed full recanalisation of the portal vein and >70% recanalisation of the superior mesenteric and splenic veins.
She was commenced on further IVIG at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg over 3 days (days 2–4 following admission). She was also treated with plasma exchange, where she received a total of five sessions (days 2–8 of admission). Pulsed methylprednisolone was also given on day 2–3 of admission at a dose of 500 mg intravenously followed by a weaning course of oral prednisolone. Rituximab at a dose of 100 mg was given on days 4 and 8. She was initiated on a argatroban infusion during the initial 13 days, which was later changed to fondaparinux. By day 14 of admission, her thrombocytopaenia had resolved.
CT head was also performed during admission, which showed a non-occlusive thrombus, affecting the left internal carotid artery, left transverse sinus and posterior aspect of the superior sagittal sinus. She was monitored closely, and her neurology remained intact throughout her admission.
Almost a month later, the patient’s condition deteriorated further. An urgent CT abdomen and pelvis revealed a pneumoperitoneum and peritoneal fluid suggesting bowel perforation. She underwent an emergency laparotomy, which identified multiple small bowel perforations; subsequent bowel resection and stoma formation were performed. She was diagnosed with small bowel syndrome and initiated on parenteral nutrition.
The patient was eventually discharged with haematology (2 weeks), gastroenterology and nutrition clinic follow-up (6 weeks). Fondaparinux injections were to be continued until her next haematology appointment. Entecavir for a total of 6 months was initiated to mitigate the low risk of hepatitis B reactivation following rituximab administration.
Discussion
The development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 has been pivotal in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. These highly effective vaccines were produced rapidly; initial trials reported no significant major safety concerns other than rare cases of anaphylaxis.3 However, with more of the population being vaccinated and follow-up is extended, it is no surprise of the emergence of new reports of adverse events.
In the UK, there has been only one other documented case report of COVID-19 vaccine-related splanchnic vein thrombosis. This patient also had coexisting pulmonary embolism.4 In both case reports, the patients were women under the age of 50; presented within 5–13 days of receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine; had no significant comorbidities and no regular medications. Both were positive for PF-4 antibodies.
Similar cases of thrombosis and thrombocytopaenia have been reported in other parts of the world. In particular, a case series in Norway reported five patients with venous thrombosis at unusual sites, presenting within 7–10 days of taking the first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine. Comparably, these patients were young women (age 32–54 years old) and had no prior use of heparin, however, had positive antibodies to PF-4. One of these patients presented with thrombosis of the splanchnic circulation. Interestingly, her presenting complaint consisted of backache 7 days after receiving the vaccine. Her bloods showed a severe isolated thrombocytopaenia. Similarly, she was managed with IVIG, prednisolone and dalteparin.5 In addition to thrombosis at unusual sites, several case reports have included thrombosis occurring in more typical sites, such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and arterial thromboses.3
The criteria for diagnosis of VITT are shown in table 1.6 All five criteria are required for a definitive diagnosis of VITT.
Criteria for diagnosing vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopaenia
1 | Onset of symptoms 5–30 days post-vaccine (or up to 42 days if isolated DVT/PE) |
2 | Presence of thrombosis |
3 | Thrombocytopaenia (platelet count <150×109 /L) |
4 | D-dimer >4000mcg/mL |
5 | Positive anti-PF4 antibodies identified on ELISA assay |
-
DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PE, pulmonary embolism.
The clinical picture of moderate to severe thrombocytopaenia and thrombosis resembles a well-known immune-mediated prothrombotic disorder: heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT). However, patients with VITT have no previous exposure to heparin use.1 VITT involves the presence of antibodies binding to PF-4/heparin complexes. By their fragment crystallisable (Fc) domains, these immune complexes bind to FcγRIIA on the surface of platelets and thus cross-link these receptors and induce platelet activation and resultant immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia.7 This novel underlying mechanism is further highlighted in a report by Scully et al, in which 23 patients were identified with VITT. In all 23 patients, the ELISA for anti-PF4 antibodies was performed on a sample obtained before the administration of heparin-based therapy and was found positive in 22 of the 23 patients. Based on such pathophysiological features, avoidance of platelet transfusions is critical as it would provide a substrate for further antibody-mediated platelet activation and coagulopathy.8
Current guidance produced by the expert haematology panel for managing VITT is based on experience of managing initial cases and other non-AstraZeneca vaccine-associated conditions. IVIG is recommended to be initiated urgently at a dose of 1 g/kg (divided into 2 days if needed), irrespective of the degree of thrombocytopaenia. Doses can be repeated as required with close monitoring and haematology discussion. Steroids can be administered if there is any delay in giving IVIG.6
As stated above, platelet transfusion should be avoided. It is unknown whether heparin exacerbates the condition, as the syndrome mimics HIT, and, therefore, should also be avoided. Anticoagulation with non-heparin-based therapies such as direct acting anticoagulants, fondaparinux, danaparoid or argatroban should be commenced depending on the clinical picture. Fibrinogen levels should be replaced using fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate if needed, to ensure level does not fall below 1.5 g/L.6
VITT that is unresponsive (refractory) to initial treatment requires urgent additional intervention with plasma exchange. A case series including three patients with VITT who had persistent thrombocytopaenia and ongoing thrombosis despite treatment with anticoagulation and IVIG showed cessation of thrombosis and improvement in platelet count following plasma replacement. Total plasma exchange (TPE) was performed daily for 5–7 days, in addition of IVIG and rituximab.9 In another large series, 220 patients with VITT were treated with TPE. The authors of this study noted that TPE in individuals with severe thrombocytopenia plus cerebral venous thrombosis or severe thrombocytopenia plus extensive thrombosis was associated with a survival rate of 90 %, which was higher than would be expected for these individuals, leading them to strongly consider TPE in such individuals.10
In this case report, although not proven as the definite cause of thrombosis, we describe an extremely rare but serious adverse event related to the AstraZeneca vaccine. It highlights the importance of early diagnosis and management to prevent life-threatening complications associated with splanchnic thrombosis, such as venous congestion of the gut, splenic rupture or liver failure.8 We hope this case study contributes towards our overall understanding of VITT.
Patient’s perspective
She was cared for by so many doctors, surgeons, consultants and nurses. It is impossible to convey individual thanks for the treatment she received, but I would like to express my thanks and gratitude to you and everyone else who were able to so quickly diagnose what was a very rare condition and take the appropriate action to save her life. Your skill and quick thinking are the reasons she is with us today—patient’s husband.
Learning points
-
If a patient presents with persistent abdominal pain 5–28 days post-AstraZeneca vaccine, consider a diagnosis of vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopaenia (VITT). Investigate for D-dimer, platelets and fibrinogen and PF-4 antibodies.
-
The recognition and management of VITT require an interprofessional team approach; a strong recommendation is for early haematology involvement and the use of IVIG as first-line treatment.
-
In severe or refractory cases, plasma exchange can be used alone or in addition to IVIG.
-
Vaccination remains crucial for prevention against the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and controlling the pandemic; the very low prevalence of VITT relative to the benefits of preventing COVID-19 must be emphasised.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors We would like to thank Addenbrookes hospital for all their care towards the patient. FP is the first author of this case. Supervised by both KM and SY.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer